Adults In Differences

Friday sermon at a mosque this time, the story of envy. Khotib very excited when preaching. At first, what he conveyed was correct. However, at the end of the sermon, many of which he conveyed was not correct.
The theme of his sermon to say is about envy / jealousy. Envy is a despicable character, qualities that should be avoided by a Muslim. Definition envy is not happy when someone else get pleasure, happiness, or success. On the contrary, feel good if someone else got calamity or hardship.
Spite of the deeds which are forbidden in Islam. Even envy is contrary to Islamic teachings, which have always taught his followers to keep other people happy, and entertaining so sorry if there are neighbors who get accidents, etc.. And khotib, thank God, quite successfully explained this included providing examples of concrete.
Unfortunately, almost at the end of the sermon he gave an example of inappropriate, which I give the sub title "grown in diversity". He explained that the difference in the community exists, including in Islam. SunatUllah Therefore, let each group perform in accordance with his understanding of Islam. And let the differences that still exist, no need to blame each other. The term that he used was blasphemous. Here he gives some examples, which I need not mention. And, he also said that this blasphemy as a form of envy.
At least that's what I understand from earlier speeches. There are some things that need to be corrected: 1. SunatUllah of an event does not guarantee that the Almighty God bless the event. No need to bother to look for examples, namely corruption. Corruption is happening already sunatUllah. But that does not mean corruption blessed Allah SWT. Any disobedience occurs also because sunatUllah, but it does not mean that Allah SWT for all disobedience ridho it. If he thinks like that, then what good is the reward of sin, and what's the point of heaven and hell. In conclusion, the difference (the split) was sunatUllah, but it does not mean that Allah blessed. In fact it is very objectionable, based on the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad split the people. 2. Khotib can not differentiate between the slander and correction (as counsel in order amar ma'ruf - nahi unjust). If your child is wrong, then we are justified, it is called as advice and not a blasphemy. And khotib averaged equate all forms of advice to the blasphemy. And that's very different. Advice based on science, which can distinguish between the right with a falsehood. While blasphemy based more on passion, emotion, and without science. 3. All of blasphemy is due to envy. It is likely this statement is not wrong, but because of the advice are also classified as blasphemy, as a result nasehatpun categorized as envy. This is clearly wrong. When we give advice to the child, whether it was because of envy? Do not reversed? Indeed, the advice is a sign of affection. If you do not love, parents would never advise his son. 4. The last important phrase is "those who blaspheme (by definition the khotib) is a person who feels most clever". Once again this is a backwards statement. Insya Allah, the truth is "people who feel most intelligent are those who do not want to be corrected".
Some things that can be used as a lesson: 1. Differences in the midst of the people there. However, there are differences that still allowed and there is a difference that was not allowed. To distinguish them, the argument takes the Qur'an and Al-Hadith. 2. When other people are advising us (of course based on science), should not it be regarded as blasphemous, especially because of envy. Advice is a sign that people are very fond of giving advice to us. 3. Science can not be abandoned. Only with the knowledge and guidance of Allah SWT, we can distinguish between right and falsehood.